Weiss Real Estate — Header

In my 35+ years selling property across Sydney’s Eastern Suburbs — from Bondi Junction to Dover Heights — I’ve watched families build extraordinary wealth inside the walls of the family home.

For decades, Australians have taken comfort in one simple belief:

“There’s no death tax in Australia.”

Technically, that’s correct. Australia abolished federal estate and inheritance taxes in 1979.

But in 2026, the landscape around inherited property — especially high-value homes — is far more complex. It is not a formal “death tax.” It is something subtler: capital gains tax consequences, stricter ATO administration, and policy debates around CGT reform.

For families inheriting prestige property in places like Dover Heights, Bellevue Hill or Rose Bay, the numbers can become significant if you misunderstand the rules.

Let’s break it down properly under current Australian law.

The Two-Year Rule: Not Automatic, But Structured

Under Subdivision 118-B of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth), a capital gain or loss from an inherited dwelling can be disregarded if:

  • The deceased acquired the property before 20 September 1985 (pre-CGT asset), or

  • The dwelling was their main residence and not used to produce income, and

  • The beneficiary sells it within two years of the date of death.

This two-year rule is often misunderstood as “automatic.” It is not.

ATO Administrative Guidance – PCG 2019/5

The Australian Taxation Office issued Practical Compliance Guideline PCG 2019/5, which sets out when the Commissioner will allow an extension of the two-year period.

The ATO will generally allow extensions where delays are outside the executor’s control, such as:

  • A challenge to the validity of the will

  • Life tenancy or equitable interest issues

  • Delays in obtaining probate

  • Complex estate administration

However, the ATO has been clear: it will not grant extensions merely because:

  • The executor waited for the market to improve

  • Renovations were undertaken to maximise sale price

  • There was inactivity or delay without valid explanation

In Sydney’s prestige market, where estates sometimes “hold” property for strategic reasons, this distinction matters enormously.

Main Residence vs Investment Property — The Critical Divide

This is where many beneficiaries make expensive assumptions.

✅ If It Was the Deceased’s Main Residence

If the property was the deceased’s main residence and not producing income at death:

  • Beneficiaries generally receive a market value cost base reset as at the date of death.

  • If sold within two years → typically no CGT.

  • If sold after two years → CGT applies only to the increase in value from date of death to sale.

❌ If It Was an Investment Property (Post-1985 Acquisition)

If the property was:

  • Purchased after 20 September 1985, and

  • Used to produce rental income,

Then the beneficiary inherits the original cost base.

There is no market value reset.

This is where exposure escalates.

Case Study: A $9 Million Dover Heights Estate

Let’s use a realistic Eastern Suburbs example.

  • Purchase price (1995): $1,500,000

  • Value at death (2026): $9,000,000

  • Sale price (2027): $10,000,000

Scenario A – Main Residence, Sold Within Two Years

If sold within two years of death and it qualified as the main residence:

CGT payable: $0

Scenario B – Main Residence, Sold After Two Years

  • Cost base reset to $9,000,000 (value at death)

  • Sale price: $10,000,000

  • Capital gain: $1,000,000

  • 50% CGT discount (if held > 12 months)

  • Taxable gain: $500,000

At the top marginal rate (47% including Medicare levy):

Approximate tax: $235,000

Scenario C – Investment Property (Purchased 1995)

  • Original cost base: $1,500,000

  • Sale price: $10,000,000

  • Capital gain: $8,500,000

  • 50% CGT discount

  • Taxable gain: $4,250,000

Potential tax exposure at 47%:
Approximately $2 million

This is not a “death tax.”
But it can feel like one if you are unprepared.

Is the 50% CGT Discount Changing?

As of early 2026:

  • The 50% CGT discount for individuals remains in place.

  • There is no enacted federal legislation reducing it to 25%.

  • Periodic policy proposals surface, but no law has passed.

It is important not to confuse political discussion with enacted legislation.

In my view, relying on “proposed reforms” is dangerous — but so is assuming current settings will never change.

How Australia Compares Globally

🇬🇧 United Kingdom

The UK applies Inheritance Tax at 40% above certain thresholds (with residence nil-rate band adjustments).
Large estates can face significant upfront tax liabilities.

🇨🇦 Canada

Canada has no inheritance tax, but uses a “deemed disposition” rule.

Upon death, assets are treated as if sold at market value.
The estate pays CGT before beneficiaries inherit.

🇺🇸 United States

The US federal estate tax threshold is high (over USD $13 million per individual in 2026, subject to sunset provisions), but several states impose additional inheritance or estate taxes.

Compared globally, Australia remains relatively generous — particularly for genuine main residences.

The Real Risk in Sydney’s Prestige Market

In suburbs like:

  • Dover Heights

  • Bellevue Hill

  • Rose Bay

We are often dealing with:

  • 30–40 years of capital growth

  • Original purchase prices under $1 million

  • Current values exceeding $10 million

The tax exposure is not theoretical.
It is arithmetic.